本文へ移動
ChartBasis
言語を選択: 日本語

人口（長期史）：国を比較

最大4か国の人口（長期史）を並べて表示します。

比較中の国

国を追加

国別の人口（長期史）

人口（長期史）

年次, 千人

出典：Maddison Project Database 2023
人口（長期史）：国別の最新データ
日付 バングラデシュウガンダメキシコ
132,90723,40897,242
135,20724,19598,403
137,42024,99299,599
139,57325,846100,863
141,65026,661102,132
143,64427,414103,334
145,54628,200104,508
147,37629,021105,738
149,04729,846107,083
150,56230,647108,554
152,18931,469110,061
153,92732,343111,468
155,63433,257112,826
157,32634,234114,163
158,99935,271115,471
160,65036,419116,757
162,27337,673118,017
163,93839,157117,444
165,65540,879118,799
167,35842,329120,289
169,04543,639121,872
170,70945,120123,260
172,35446,645124,462
174,21748,065125,247

Source: Bolt, J. and van Zanden, J.L. (2024), Maddison style estimates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2023 update, Journal of Economic Surveys, 1-41, DOI 10.1111/joes.12618. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. The original sources are listed on each page.

データの出典一覧

これらの推計の原資料

GDP pc: 2008 - 2022: Total Economy Database the Conference Board for all countries included in TED. Otherwise UN national accounts statistics

バングラデシュ

  • 1900-1950: Maddison, A. Monitoring the World Economy, 1995

ウガンダ

  • 1906-1950: Broadberry, S., & Gardner, L. (2022). Economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa, 1885–2008: Evidence from eight countries. Explorations in Economic History, 83, 101424.

メキシコ

  • 1550–1812: Arroyo Abad, L. and J.L. van Zanden (2016), “Growth under Extractive Institutions? Latin American Per Capita GDP in Colonial Times” Journal of Economic History 76(4): 1182–1215.
  • 1812–1870: Prados de la Escosura, L., (2009), ‘Lost decades? Economic performance in post-independence Latin America’, Journal of Latin America Studies, 41, pp. 279–307. (updated data)
  • 1870-1895: Bértola, L., & Ocampo, J. A. (2012). The Economic Development of Latin America since Independence. Oxford University Press, Table A.2
  • 1895–2003: Barro, R.J. and J.F. Ursua, (2008). “Macroeconomic Crises since 1870” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 39(1 (Spring), pages 255-350