本文へ移動
ChartBasis
言語を選択: 日本語

人口(長期史):国を比較

最大4か国の人口(長期史)を並べて表示します。

比較中の国

国を追加

国別の人口(長期史)

人口(長期史)

年次, 千人

出典:Maddison Project Database 2023
人口(長期史):国別の最新データ
日付 ブラジルロシアエクアドル
174,320147,21812,268
176,902146,60012,446
179,389145,98012,629
181,721145,31012,827
183,970144,65213,074
186,165144,07113,368
188,330143,52213,661
190,438143,05313,915
192,450142,80914,133
194,458142,74614,352
196,464142,78914,569
198,408142,85314,786
200,152142,96415,002
201,894143,20515,218
203,614143,51015,433
205,358146,09415,647
207,148146,41015,860
208,859146,67816,072
210,537146,84616,282
212,258146,83416,489
213,940146,76816,693
215,577146,46316,894
216,720145,84917,093
217,718146,69317,288

Source: Bolt, J. and van Zanden, J.L. (2024), Maddison style estimates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2023 update, Journal of Economic Surveys, 1-41, DOI 10.1111/joes.12618. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. The original sources are listed on each page.

データの出典一覧

これらの推計の原資料

GDP pc: 2008 - 2022: Total Economy Database the Conference Board for all countries included in TED. Otherwise UN national accounts statistics

ブラジル

  • 1800 - 1870: Prados de la Escosura, L. (2009). “Lost Decades? Economic Performance in Post-Independence Latin America,” Journal of Latin America Studies 41: 279–307 (updated data)
  • 1850–1899: Barro, R.J. and J.F. Ursua, (2008). “Macroeconomic Crises since 1870” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 39(1 (Spring), pages 255-350
  • 1900-1950: A. Maddison and Associates, The Political Economy of Poverty, Equity and Growth: Brazil and Mexico, Oxford University Press, New York 1992;

ロシア

  • 1860-1885: Kuboniwa, M. (2019). Estimating GDP and Foreign Rents of the Oil and Gas Sector in the Soviet Union and Present-Day Russia. In M. Kuboniwa, Y. Nakamura, K. Kumo, & Y. Shida (Eds.), Russian Economic Development over Three Centuries: New Data and Inferences (pp. 421–438). Springer.

エクアドル

  • 1833-1938: Prados de la Escosura, L. (2009). “Lost Decades? Economic Performance in Post-Independence Latin America,” Journal of Latin America Studies 41: 279–307. (updated data). We use the growth rate between 1933 and 1938 from Prados de la Escosura (2009) and link that to the 1939 level of Maddison’s original estimates.