本文へ移動
ChartBasis
言語を選択: 日本語

人口(長期史):国を比較

最大4か国の人口(長期史)を並べて表示します。

比較中の国

国を追加

国別の人口(長期史)

人口(長期史)

年次, 千人

出典:Maddison Project Database 2023
人口(長期史):国別の最新データ
日付 ブラジルスウェーデンレバノン
174,3208,8583,460
176,9028,8723,499
179,3898,8963,554
181,7218,9253,610
183,9708,9583,665
186,1658,9943,721
188,3309,0303,777
190,4389,0813,853
192,4509,1483,954
194,4589,2204,036
196,4649,2994,082
198,4089,3784,097
200,1529,4494,115
201,8949,5194,206
203,6149,6004,696
205,3589,6965,365
207,1489,7995,640
208,8599,9235,688
210,53710,0585,680
212,25810,1755,562
213,94010,2795,331
215,57710,3544,986
216,72010,4164,802
217,71810,4874,713

Source: Bolt, J. and van Zanden, J.L. (2024), Maddison style estimates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2023 update, Journal of Economic Surveys, 1-41, DOI 10.1111/joes.12618. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. The original sources are listed on each page.

データの出典一覧

これらの推計の原資料

GDP pc: 2008 - 2022: Total Economy Database the Conference Board for all countries included in TED. Otherwise UN national accounts statistics

ブラジル

  • 1800 - 1870: Prados de la Escosura, L. (2009). “Lost Decades? Economic Performance in Post-Independence Latin America,” Journal of Latin America Studies 41: 279–307 (updated data)
  • 1850–1899: Barro, R.J. and J.F. Ursua, (2008). “Macroeconomic Crises since 1870” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 39(1 (Spring), pages 255-350
  • 1900-1950: A. Maddison and Associates, The Political Economy of Poverty, Equity and Growth: Brazil and Mexico, Oxford University Press, New York 1992;

スウェーデン

  • 1300–1560: Krantz, O. (2017) “Swedish GDP 1300-1560 A Tentative Estimate” Lund Papers in Economic History: General Issues; No. 152.
  • 1560–1950: Schön, L., and O. Krantz (2015) “New Swedish Historical National Accounts since the 16th Century in Constant and Current Prices” Lund Papers in Economic History no. 140

レバノン

  • 1820, 1870, 1913, 1950: Pamuk, S. (2006), Estimating Economic Growth in the Middle East since 1820, The Journal of Economic History, vol 66, no. 3, pp. 809 - 828