本文へ移動
ChartBasis
言語を選択: 日本語

人口（長期史）：国を比較

最大4か国の人口（長期史）を並べて表示します。

比較中の国

国を追加

国別の人口（長期史）

人口（長期史）

年次, 千人

出典：Maddison Project Database 2023
人口（長期史）：国別の最新データ
日付 ドイツバングラデシュメキシコ
81,439132,90797,242
81,474135,20798,403
81,534137,42099,599
81,595139,573100,863
81,566141,650102,132
81,473143,644103,334
81,354145,546104,508
81,190147,376105,738
81,009149,047107,083
80,781150,562108,554
80,500152,189110,061
80,301153,927111,468
80,292155,634112,826
80,443157,326114,163
80,663158,999115,471
81,000160,650116,757
81,704162,273118,017
82,366163,938117,444
82,674165,655118,799
82,923167,358120,289
83,110169,045121,872
83,178170,709123,260
83,213172,354124,462
83,811174,217125,247

Source: Bolt, J. and van Zanden, J.L. (2024), Maddison style estimates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2023 update, Journal of Economic Surveys, 1-41, DOI 10.1111/joes.12618. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. The original sources are listed on each page.

データの出典一覧

これらの推計の原資料

GDP pc: 2008 - 2022: Total Economy Database the Conference Board for all countries included in TED. Otherwise UN national accounts statistics

ドイツ

  • 1500-1850: Pfister, U. (2022). Economic Growth in Germany, 1500–1850. The Journal of Economic History, 82(4), 1071–1107
  • 1850-1950: Hoffmann, Grumbach and Hesse, op. cit., pp. 454-5.

バングラデシュ

  • 1900-1950: Maddison, A. Monitoring the World Economy, 1995

メキシコ

  • 1550–1812: Arroyo Abad, L. and J.L. van Zanden (2016), “Growth under Extractive Institutions? Latin American Per Capita GDP in Colonial Times” Journal of Economic History 76(4): 1182–1215.
  • 1812–1870: Prados de la Escosura, L., (2009), ‘Lost decades? Economic performance in post-independence Latin America’, Journal of Latin America Studies, 41, pp. 279–307. (updated data)
  • 1870-1895: Bértola, L., & Ocampo, J. A. (2012). The Economic Development of Latin America since Independence. Oxford University Press, Table A.2
  • 1895–2003: Barro, R.J. and J.F. Ursua, (2008). “Macroeconomic Crises since 1870” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 39(1 (Spring), pages 255-350