本文へ移動
ChartBasis
言語を選択: 日本語

人口(長期史):国を比較

最大4か国の人口(長期史)を並べて表示します。

比較中の国

4か国を比較中です。グラフで見やすく表示できる上限です。別の国を追加するには、1つ削除してください。

国別の人口(長期史)

人口(長期史)

年次, 千人

出典:Maddison Project Database 2023
人口(長期史):国別の最新データ
日付 アイスランドスイスバングラデシュエクアドル
2777,258132,90712,268
2817,296135,20712,446
2857,332137,42012,629
2887,384139,57312,827
2897,438141,65013,074
2937,488143,64413,368
2967,532145,54613,661
3047,579147,37613,915
3117,647149,04714,133
3197,738150,56214,352
3197,825152,18914,569
3187,884153,92714,786
3197,959155,63415,002
3218,044157,32615,218
3248,137158,99915,433
3278,237160,65015,647
3318,332162,27315,860
3358,423163,93816,072
3438,502165,65516,282
3538,565167,35816,489
3618,626169,04516,693
3668,689170,70916,894
3728,756172,35417,093
3808,834174,21717,288

Source: Bolt, J. and van Zanden, J.L. (2024), Maddison style estimates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2023 update, Journal of Economic Surveys, 1-41, DOI 10.1111/joes.12618. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. The original sources are listed on each page.

データの出典一覧

これらの推計の原資料

GDP pc: 2008 - 2022: Total Economy Database the Conference Board for all countries included in TED. Otherwise UN national accounts statistics

アイスランド

  • 1870-1945: Jonsson, G. (1998). The gross domestic product of Iceland, 1870-1945. Nordiska Historiska Nasjonalregnkaper, Artikkelsamling from Workshop IV, Solstrand 13-15 NOvember 1998.

スイス

  • 1: Scheidel, W. and Friesen, S. J., ‘The size of the economy and the distribution of income in the Roman Empire’, Journal of Roman Studies, 99 (2009), pp. 61–91
  • 1850-2011: Stohr, Christian (2016), Trading Gains: new estimates of Swiss GDP, 1851-2008. Economic History Working Papers, 245/2016. London School of Economics and Political Science, Economic History Department, London, UK

バングラデシュ

  • 1900-1950: Maddison, A. Monitoring the World Economy, 1995

エクアドル

  • 1833-1938: Prados de la Escosura, L. (2009). “Lost Decades? Economic Performance in Post-Independence Latin America,” Journal of Latin America Studies 41: 279–307. (updated data). We use the growth rate between 1933 and 1938 from Prados de la Escosura (2009) and link that to the 1939 level of Maddison’s original estimates.