本文へ移動
ChartBasis
言語を選択: 日本語

人口（長期史）：国を比較

最大4か国の人口（長期史）を並べて表示します。

比較中の国

国を追加

国別の人口（長期史）

人口（長期史）

年次, 千人

出典：Maddison Project Database 2023
人口（長期史）：国別の最新データ
日付 イタリアフィンランドスウェーデン
56,9405,1668,858
56,9665,1768,872
57,0045,1888,896
57,1145,2018,925
57,4235,2138,958
57,8525,2288,994
58,1915,2469,030
58,4245,2669,081
58,7815,2899,148
59,2365,3139,220
59,5805,3399,299
59,8445,3639,378
60,0525,3889,449
60,2165,4149,519
60,3375,4399,600
60,3465,4639,696
60,2555,4819,799
60,1405,4959,923
60,0275,50810,058
59,9025,51610,175
59,7545,52210,279
59,4645,53110,354
59,1585,54210,416
58,9665,55610,487

Source: Bolt, J. and van Zanden, J.L. (2024), Maddison style estimates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2023 update, Journal of Economic Surveys, 1-41, DOI 10.1111/joes.12618. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. The original sources are listed on each page.

データの出典一覧

これらの推計の原資料

GDP pc: 2008 - 2022: Total Economy Database the Conference Board for all countries included in TED. Otherwise UN national accounts statistics

イタリア

  • 1451-1861: Chilosi, D., & Ciccarelli, C. (2023). Italy in the Great Divergence: What Can We Learn from Engel’s Law (SSRN Scholarly Paper 4514091).
  • 1861-1871 (North Italy): Malanima, P. (2010), “The long decline of a leading economy: GDP in central and northern Italy, 1300–1913” European Review of Economic History 15 (2): 169–219.
  • 1871-1990: Baffigi, A. (2011).”Italian National Accounts, 1861-2011”, Banca d’Italia Economic History Working Papers 18.

フィンランド

  • 1600–1860: Eloranta, J., Voutilainen, M. and Nummela, I. (2016). “Estimating Finnish Economic Growth Before 1860” mimeo.
  • 1860-1960: R. Hjerppe, The Finnish Economy 1860-1985: Growth and Structural Change, Bank of Finland, Helsinki, 1989, pp. 198-200.

スウェーデン

  • 1300–1560: Krantz, O. (2017) “Swedish GDP 1300-1560 A Tentative Estimate” Lund Papers in Economic History: General Issues; No. 152.
  • 1560–1950: Schön, L., and O. Krantz (2015) “New Swedish Historical National Accounts since the 16th Century in Constant and Current Prices” Lund Papers in Economic History no. 140