本文へ移動
ChartBasis
言語を選択: 日本語

人口（長期史）：国を比較

最大4か国の人口（長期史）を並べて表示します。

比較中の国

国を追加

国別の人口（長期史）

人口（長期史）

年次, 千人

出典：Maddison Project Database 2023
人口（長期史）：国別の最新データ
日付 イタリアウガンダインドネシア
56,94023,408208,105
56,96624,195211,408
57,00424,992214,475
57,11425,846217,516
57,42326,661220,549
57,85227,414224,473
58,19128,200227,534
58,42429,021230,739
58,78129,846233,918
59,23630,647237,056
59,58031,469240,140
59,84432,343243,171
60,05233,257246,150
60,21634,234249,086
60,33735,271251,947
60,34636,419254,702
60,25537,673257,351
60,14039,157259,906
60,02740,879262,379
59,90242,329264,789
59,75443,639267,142
59,46445,120269,437
59,15846,645271,674
58,96648,065273,409

Source: Bolt, J. and van Zanden, J.L. (2024), Maddison style estimates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2023 update, Journal of Economic Surveys, 1-41, DOI 10.1111/joes.12618. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. The original sources are listed on each page.

データの出典一覧

これらの推計の原資料

GDP pc: 2008 - 2022: Total Economy Database the Conference Board for all countries included in TED. Otherwise UN national accounts statistics

イタリア

  • 1451-1861: Chilosi, D., & Ciccarelli, C. (2023). Italy in the Great Divergence: What Can We Learn from Engel’s Law (SSRN Scholarly Paper 4514091).
  • 1861-1871 (North Italy): Malanima, P. (2010), “The long decline of a leading economy: GDP in central and northern Italy, 1300–1913” European Review of Economic History 15 (2): 169–219.
  • 1871-1990: Baffigi, A. (2011).”Italian National Accounts, 1861-2011”, Banca d’Italia Economic History Working Papers 18.

ウガンダ

  • 1906-1950: Broadberry, S., & Gardner, L. (2022). Economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa, 1885–2008: Evidence from eight countries. Explorations in Economic History, 83, 101424.

インドネシア

  • 1815 – 1880 (Java): Van Zanden (2012). “Economic Growth in Java 1815-1939: The Reconstruction of the Historical National Accounts of a Colonial Economy”, Maddison-Project Working Paper WP-3.
  • 1880-2008: Van der Eng, P. (2010). The Sources of Long-Term Economic Growth in Indonesia, 1880-2008”, Explorations in Economic History, 47: 294-309