本文へ移動
ChartBasis
言語を選択: 日本語

人口(長期史):国を比較

最大4か国の人口(長期史)を並べて表示します。

比較中の国

国を追加

国別の人口(長期史)

人口(長期史)

年次, 千人

出典:Maddison Project Database 2023
人口(長期史):国別の最新データ
日付 メキシコバングラデシュサウジアラビア
97,242132,90719,964
98,403135,20720,426
99,599137,42020,956
100,863139,57321,549
102,132141,65022,189
103,334143,64422,850
104,508145,54623,516
105,738147,37624,178
107,083149,04724,841
108,554150,56225,518
110,061152,18926,227
111,468153,92727,068
112,826155,63427,810
114,163157,32628,516
115,471158,99929,220
116,757160,65029,936
118,017162,27330,646
117,444163,93831,360
118,799165,65532,184
120,289167,35832,869
121,872169,04533,661
123,260170,70934,542
124,462172,35433,651
125,247174,21734,081

Source: Bolt, J. and van Zanden, J.L. (2024), Maddison style estimates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2023 update, Journal of Economic Surveys, 1-41, DOI 10.1111/joes.12618. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. The original sources are listed on each page.

データの出典一覧

これらの推計の原資料

GDP pc: 2008 - 2022: Total Economy Database the Conference Board for all countries included in TED. Otherwise UN national accounts statistics

メキシコ

  • 1550–1812: Arroyo Abad, L. and J.L. van Zanden (2016), “Growth under Extractive Institutions? Latin American Per Capita GDP in Colonial Times” Journal of Economic History 76(4): 1182–1215.
  • 1812–1870: Prados de la Escosura, L., (2009), ‘Lost decades? Economic performance in post-independence Latin America’, Journal of Latin America Studies, 41, pp. 279–307. (updated data)
  • 1870-1895: Bértola, L., & Ocampo, J. A. (2012). The Economic Development of Latin America since Independence. Oxford University Press, Table A.2
  • 1895–2003: Barro, R.J. and J.F. Ursua, (2008). “Macroeconomic Crises since 1870” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 39(1 (Spring), pages 255-350

バングラデシュ

  • 1900-1950: Maddison, A. Monitoring the World Economy, 1995

サウジアラビア

  • 1820, 1870, 1913, 1950: Pamuk, S. (2006), Estimating Economic Growth in the Middle East since 1820, The Journal of Economic History, vol 66, no. 3, pp. 809 - 828