本文へ移動
ChartBasis
言語を選択: 日本語

人口（長期史）：国を比較

最大4か国の人口（長期史）を並べて表示します。

比較中の国

国を追加

国別の人口（長期史）

人口（長期史）

年次, 千人

出典：Maddison Project Database 2023
人口（長期史）：国別の最新データ
日付 ルーマニア日本エクアドル
22,414126,51212,268
22,262126,75512,446
22,106127,05612,629
21,931127,32412,827
21,828127,55813,074
21,704127,65813,368
21,571127,67913,661
21,443127,76213,915
21,129127,90414,133
20,779127,96914,352
20,607127,95814,569
20,485127,96714,786
20,385127,75515,002
20,296127,47615,218
20,224127,25715,433
20,151127,18615,647
20,055127,03415,860
19,938126,85716,072
19,823126,63116,282
19,713126,36816,489
19,622126,09216,693
19,496125,63416,894
19,351125,42717,093
19,266124,76217,288

Source: Bolt, J. and van Zanden, J.L. (2024), Maddison style estimates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2023 update, Journal of Economic Surveys, 1-41, DOI 10.1111/joes.12618. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. The original sources are listed on each page.

データの出典一覧

これらの推計の原資料

GDP pc: 2008 - 2022: Total Economy Database the Conference Board for all countries included in TED. Otherwise UN national accounts statistics

ルーマニア

  • 1862–1995: Axenciuc, V. (2012). Produsul intern brut al Romaniei, Vol. 1, Institutl de Economie Nationala, Bucarest
  • 1915-1919 & 1949: Voinea, L., Cojocaru, A., Costache, B., Grigoraș, V., Lovin, H., Neagu, C., Orțan, D., & Tănase, A. (2019). One Hundred Years of Honesty: Recovering the Lost Memory of the Romanian Economy 1918-2018.

日本

  • 724-1874: Bassino, Jean-Pascal & Broadberry, Stephen & Fukao, Kyoji & Gupta, Bishnupriya & Takashima, Masanori, (2018). "Japan and the Great Divergence, 730-1874," CEI Working Paper Series 2018-13, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University
  • 1874-1940: Fukao, K., Bassino, J.-P., Makino, T., Paprzycki, R., Settsu, T., Takashima, M., and Tokui, J. (2015) Regional Inequality and Industrial Structure in Japan: 1874-2008, Tokyo: Maruzen Publishing.

エクアドル

  • 1833-1938: Prados de la Escosura, L. (2009). “Lost Decades? Economic Performance in Post-Independence Latin America,” Journal of Latin America Studies 41: 279–307. (updated data). We use the growth rate between 1933 and 1938 from Prados de la Escosura (2009) and link that to the 1939 level of Maddison’s original estimates.