本文へ移動
ChartBasis
言語を選択: 日本語

人口(長期史):国を比較

最大4か国の人口(長期史)を並べて表示します。

比較中の国

国を追加

国別の人口(長期史)

人口(長期史)

年次, 千人

出典:Maddison Project Database 2023
人口(長期史):国別の最新データ
日付 ウルグアイルーマニアインドネシア
3,23422,414208,105
3,24622,262211,408
3,25722,106214,475
3,26821,931217,516
3,27721,828220,549
3,28521,704224,473
3,29121,571227,534
3,29821,443230,739
3,30521,129233,918
3,31320,779237,056
3,32120,607240,140
3,32920,485243,171
3,33720,385246,150
3,34520,296249,086
3,35320,224251,947
3,36220,151254,702
3,37120,055257,351
3,38019,938259,906
3,39019,823262,379
3,39919,713264,789
3,40819,622267,142
3,41719,496269,437
3,42619,351271,674
3,42219,266273,409

Source: Bolt, J. and van Zanden, J.L. (2024), Maddison style estimates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2023 update, Journal of Economic Surveys, 1-41, DOI 10.1111/joes.12618. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. The original sources are listed on each page.

データの出典一覧

これらの推計の原資料

GDP pc: 2008 - 2022: Total Economy Database the Conference Board for all countries included in TED. Otherwise UN national accounts statistics

ウルグアイ

  • 1800-1870: Prados de la Escosura, L. (2009). “Lost Decades? Economic Performance in Post-Independence Latin America,” Journal of Latin America Studies 41: 279–307. (updated data)
  • 1870–2014: Bèrtola, L. (2016). El PIB per Capita de Uruguay 1870 - 2016: una reconstruccion. PHES working paper No 48

ルーマニア

  • 1862–1995: Axenciuc, V. (2012). Produsul intern brut al Romaniei, Vol. 1, Institutl de Economie Nationala, Bucarest
  • 1915-1919 & 1949: Voinea, L., Cojocaru, A., Costache, B., Grigoraș, V., Lovin, H., Neagu, C., Orțan, D., & Tănase, A. (2019). One Hundred Years of Honesty: Recovering the Lost Memory of the Romanian Economy 1918-2018.

インドネシア

  • 1815 – 1880 (Java): Van Zanden (2012). “Economic Growth in Java 1815-1939: The Reconstruction of the Historical National Accounts of a Colonial Economy”, Maddison-Project Working Paper WP-3.
  • 1880-2008: Van der Eng, P. (2010). The Sources of Long-Term Economic Growth in Indonesia, 1880-2008”, Explorations in Economic History, 47: 294-309