本文へ移動
ChartBasis
言語を選択: 日本語

人口（長期史）：国を比較

最大4か国の人口（長期史）を並べて表示します。

比較中の国

4か国を比較中です。グラフで見やすく表示できる上限です。別の国を追加するには、1つ削除してください。

国別の人口（長期史）

人口（長期史）

年次, 千人

出典：Maddison Project Database 2023
人口（長期史）：国別の最新データ
日付 ザンビアアイスランドスイスエクアドル
10,3272777,25812,268
10,6492817,29612,446
10,9802857,33212,629
11,2902887,38412,827
11,5932897,43813,074
11,9072937,48813,368
12,2432967,53213,661
12,6123047,57913,915
13,0053117,64714,133
13,4123197,73814,352
13,8223197,82514,569
14,2553187,88414,786
14,7093197,95915,002
15,1653218,04415,218
15,6313248,13715,433
16,1213278,23715,647
16,6243318,33215,860
17,1403358,42316,072
17,6743438,50216,282
18,2223538,56516,489
18,7803618,62616,693
19,3493668,68916,894
19,9283728,75617,093
20,4853808,83417,288

Source: Bolt, J. and van Zanden, J.L. (2024), Maddison style estimates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2023 update, Journal of Economic Surveys, 1-41, DOI 10.1111/joes.12618. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. The original sources are listed on each page.

データの出典一覧

これらの推計の原資料

GDP pc: 2008 - 2022: Total Economy Database the Conference Board for all countries included in TED. Otherwise UN national accounts statistics

ザンビア

  • 1906-1950: Broadberry, S., & Gardner, L. (2022). Economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa, 1885–2008: Evidence from eight countries. Explorations in Economic History, 83, 101424.

アイスランド

  • 1870-1945: Jonsson, G. (1998). The gross domestic product of Iceland, 1870-1945. Nordiska Historiska Nasjonalregnkaper, Artikkelsamling from Workshop IV, Solstrand 13-15 NOvember 1998.

スイス

  • 1: Scheidel, W. and Friesen, S. J., ‘The size of the economy and the distribution of income in the Roman Empire’, Journal of Roman Studies, 99 (2009), pp. 61–91
  • 1850-2011: Stohr, Christian (2016), Trading Gains: new estimates of Swiss GDP, 1851-2008. Economic History Working Papers, 245/2016. London School of Economics and Political Science, Economic History Department, London, UK

エクアドル

  • 1833-1938: Prados de la Escosura, L. (2009). “Lost Decades? Economic Performance in Post-Independence Latin America,” Journal of Latin America Studies 41: 279–307. (updated data). We use the growth rate between 1933 and 1938 from Prados de la Escosura (2009) and link that to the 1939 level of Maddison’s original estimates.