本文へ移動
ChartBasis
言語を選択: 日本語

人口(長期史):国を比較

最大4か国の人口(長期史)を並べて表示します。

比較中の国

4か国を比較中です。グラフで見やすく表示できる上限です。別の国を追加するには、1つ削除してください。

国別の人口(長期史)

人口(長期史)

年次, 千人

出典:Maddison Project Database 2023
人口(長期史):国別の最新データ
日付 ザンビアアイスランドフィリピンスウェーデン
10,32727779,3468,858
10,64928181,1318,872
10,98028583,0238,896
11,29028884,8768,925
11,59328986,6978,958
11,90729388,5688,994
12,24329690,4189,030
12,61230492,2539,081
13,00531194,0989,148
13,41231995,9239,220
13,82231997,6279,299
14,25531899,3179,378
14,709319100,9999,449
15,165321102,6189,519
15,631324104,2999,600
16,121327106,0769,696
16,624331107,8689,799
17,140335109,4939,923
17,674343111,09410,058
18,222353112,84310,175
18,780361114,63610,279
19,349366117,02610,354
19,928372119,47310,416
20,485380121,23410,487

Source: Bolt, J. and van Zanden, J.L. (2024), Maddison style estimates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2023 update, Journal of Economic Surveys, 1-41, DOI 10.1111/joes.12618. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. The original sources are listed on each page.

データの出典一覧

これらの推計の原資料

GDP pc: 2008 - 2022: Total Economy Database the Conference Board for all countries included in TED. Otherwise UN national accounts statistics

ザンビア

  • 1906-1950: Broadberry, S., & Gardner, L. (2022). Economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa, 1885–2008: Evidence from eight countries. Explorations in Economic History, 83, 101424.

アイスランド

  • 1870-1945: Jonsson, G. (1998). The gross domestic product of Iceland, 1870-1945. Nordiska Historiska Nasjonalregnkaper, Artikkelsamling from Workshop IV, Solstrand 13-15 NOvember 1998.

フィリピン

  • 1820-1900: Maddison, A. Monitoring the World Economy, 1995
  • 1900-1950: R.W. Hooley, "Long Term Growth of the Philippine Economy, 1902-1961", , The Philippine Economic Journal, First Semester, 1968.

スウェーデン

  • 1300–1560: Krantz, O. (2017) “Swedish GDP 1300-1560 A Tentative Estimate” Lund Papers in Economic History: General Issues; No. 152.
  • 1560–1950: Schön, L., and O. Krantz (2015) “New Swedish Historical National Accounts since the 16th Century in Constant and Current Prices” Lund Papers in Economic History no. 140