本文へ移動
ChartBasis
言語を選択: 日本語

人口(長期史):国を比較

最大4か国の人口(長期史)を並べて表示します。

比較中の国

国を追加

国別の人口(長期史)

人口(長期史)

年次, 千人

出典:Maddison Project Database 2023
人口(長期史):国別の最新データ
日付 ザンビアイタリアパナマ
10,32756,9402,848
10,64956,9662,900
10,98057,0042,952
11,29057,1143,003
11,59357,4233,054
11,90757,8523,104
12,24358,1913,155
12,61258,4243,206
13,00558,7813,258
13,41259,2363,310
13,82259,5803,360
14,25559,8443,411
14,70960,0523,460
15,16560,2163,510
15,63160,3373,559
16,12160,3463,608
16,62460,2553,657
17,14060,1403,705
17,67460,0273,753
18,22259,9023,801
18,78059,7543,862
19,34959,4643,918
19,92859,1583,970
20,48558,9664,023

Source: Bolt, J. and van Zanden, J.L. (2024), Maddison style estimates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2023 update, Journal of Economic Surveys, 1-41, DOI 10.1111/joes.12618. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. The original sources are listed on each page.

データの出典一覧

これらの推計の原資料

GDP pc: 2008 - 2022: Total Economy Database the Conference Board for all countries included in TED. Otherwise UN national accounts statistics

ザンビア

  • 1906-1950: Broadberry, S., & Gardner, L. (2022). Economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa, 1885–2008: Evidence from eight countries. Explorations in Economic History, 83, 101424.

イタリア

  • 1451-1861: Chilosi, D., & Ciccarelli, C. (2023). Italy in the Great Divergence: What Can We Learn from Engel’s Law (SSRN Scholarly Paper 4514091).
  • 1861-1871 (North Italy): Malanima, P. (2010), “The long decline of a leading economy: GDP in central and northern Italy, 1300–1913” European Review of Economic History 15 (2): 169–219.
  • 1871-1990: Baffigi, A. (2011).”Italian National Accounts, 1861-2011”, Banca d’Italia Economic History Working Papers 18.

パナマ

  • 1906–1945: De Corso, G. (2013). El crecimiento economico de Venuzuela, Desde la Oligarquia Conservadora Hasta La Revolucion Bolivariana: 1830-2012. Uno Vision cuantitativa *: Venezuelan Economic Growth From The Conservative Oligarchy To The Bolivarian Revolution (1830-2012), Revista De Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History, 31(3), 321-357. doi:10.1017/S0212610913000190