本文へ移動
ChartBasis
言語を選択: 日本語

人口(長期史):国を比較

最大4か国の人口(長期史)を並べて表示します。

比較中の国

4か国を比較中です。グラフで見やすく表示できる上限です。別の国を追加するには、1つ削除してください。

国別の人口(長期史)

人口(長期史)

年次, 千人

出典:Maddison Project Database 2023
人口(長期史):国別の最新データ
日付 ザンビアタイルーマニアイスラエル
10,32759,74822,4145,927
10,64960,16522,2626,088
10,98060,74622,1066,236
11,29061,32321,9316,366
11,59361,88421,8286,484
11,90762,42521,7046,603
12,24362,95621,5716,723
12,61263,46721,4436,846
13,00563,93721,1296,972
13,41264,38120,7797,100
13,82264,80420,6077,226
14,25565,20820,4857,360
14,70965,59920,3857,498
15,16565,97020,2967,637
15,63166,33220,2247,781
16,12166,67320,1517,931
16,62466,97520,0558,091
17,14067,25019,9388,251
17,67467,50619,8238,412
18,22267,75019,7138,576
18,78067,97519,6228,742
19,34968,18019,4968,899
19,92868,36619,3519,047
20,48568,45719,2669,188

Source: Bolt, J. and van Zanden, J.L. (2024), Maddison style estimates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2023 update, Journal of Economic Surveys, 1-41, DOI 10.1111/joes.12618. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. The original sources are listed on each page.

データの出典一覧

これらの推計の原資料

GDP pc: 2008 - 2022: Total Economy Database the Conference Board for all countries included in TED. Otherwise UN national accounts statistics

ザンビア

  • 1906-1950: Broadberry, S., & Gardner, L. (2022). Economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa, 1885–2008: Evidence from eight countries. Explorations in Economic History, 83, 101424.

タイ

  • 1820-1900: Maddison, A. Monitoring the World Economy, 1995
  • 1900-50: Sompop Manarungsan, "Economic Development of Thailand, 1850-1950", University of Groningen, Ph. D. thesis, 1989

ルーマニア

  • 1862–1995: Axenciuc, V. (2012). Produsul intern brut al Romaniei, Vol. 1, Institutl de Economie Nationala, Bucarest
  • 1915-1919 & 1949: Voinea, L., Cojocaru, A., Costache, B., Grigoraș, V., Lovin, H., Neagu, C., Orțan, D., & Tănase, A. (2019). One Hundred Years of Honesty: Recovering the Lost Memory of the Romanian Economy 1918-2018.

イスラエル

  • 1: Scheidel, W. and Friesen, S. J., ‘The size of the economy and the distribution of income in the Roman Empire’, Journal of Roman Studies, 99 (2009), pp. 61–91