Zum Inhalt springen
ChartBasis
Sprache auswählen: Deutsch

Bevölkerung, Langzeitreihe: Länder vergleichen

Bevölkerung, Langzeitreihe für bis zu vier Länder nebeneinander.

Verglichene Länder

Land hinzufügen

Bevölkerung, Langzeitreihe nach Land

Bevölkerung, Langzeitreihe

Jährlich, Tausend Personen

Quelle: Maddison Project Database 2023
Bevölkerung, Langzeitreihe: neueste Beobachtungen je Land
Datum IslandJordanienKuba
2774.59111.108
2814.70011.147
2854.81111.179
2884.92311.210
2895.03711.241
2935.16111.260
2965.29511.268
3045.76511.266
3116.24311.261
3196.39711.258
3196.53811.260
3186.68011.262
3196.84011.264
3216.95211.262
3247.70611.250
3278.83911.238
3319.50611.214
3359.86311.180
34310.06611.147
35310.27311.116
36110.48011.105
36610.62811.089
37210.71611.046
38010.84911.003

Source: Bolt, J. and van Zanden, J.L. (2024), Maddison style estimates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2023 update, Journal of Economic Surveys, 1-41, DOI 10.1111/joes.12618. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. The original sources are listed on each page.

Alle Datenquellen

Originalquellen dieser Schätzungen

GDP pc: 2008 - 2022: Total Economy Database the Conference Board for all countries included in TED. Otherwise UN national accounts statistics

Island

  • 1870-1945: Jonsson, G. (1998). The gross domestic product of Iceland, 1870-1945. Nordiska Historiska Nasjonalregnkaper, Artikkelsamling from Workshop IV, Solstrand 13-15 NOvember 1998.

Jordanien

  • 1: Scheidel, W. and Friesen, S. J., ‘The size of the economy and the distribution of income in the Roman Empire’, Journal of Roman Studies, 99 (2009), pp. 61–91
  • 1820, 1870, 1913, 1950: Pamuk, S. (2006), Estimating Economic Growth in the Middle East since 1820, The Journal of Economic History, vol 66, no. 3, pp. 809 - 828

Kuba

  • 1690–1895: Santamaria Garcia, A. (2005). Las Cuentas nacionales de Cuba, 1960 - 2005', mimeo
  • 1902–1958: Ward, M. and Devereux, J. (2012), “The Road Not Taken: Pre-Revolutionary Cuban Living Standards in Comparative Perspective” Journal of Economic History, 72(1): 104–132