Zum Inhalt springen
ChartBasis
Sprache auswählen: Deutsch

Bevölkerung, Langzeitreihe: Länder vergleichen

Bevölkerung, Langzeitreihe für bis zu vier Länder nebeneinander.

Verglichene Länder

Land hinzufügen

Bevölkerung, Langzeitreihe nach Land

Bevölkerung, Langzeitreihe

Jährlich, Tausend Personen

Quelle: Maddison Project Database 2023
Bevölkerung, Langzeitreihe: neueste Beobachtungen je Land
Datum SüdkoreaJordanienSaudi-Arabien
46.6174.59119.964
47.0084.70020.426
47.3704.81120.956
47.6454.92321.549
47.8925.03722.189
48.0835.16122.850
48.1855.29523.516
48.4385.76524.178
48.6846.24324.841
49.0556.39725.518
49.3086.53826.227
49.5546.68027.068
49.9376.84027.810
50.2006.95228.516
50.4297.70629.220
50.7478.83929.936
51.0159.50630.646
51.2189.86331.360
51.36210.06632.184
51.58510.27332.869
51.76510.48033.661
51.83610.62834.542
51.74510.71633.651
51.73110.84934.081

Source: Bolt, J. and van Zanden, J.L. (2024), Maddison style estimates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2023 update, Journal of Economic Surveys, 1-41, DOI 10.1111/joes.12618. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. The original sources are listed on each page.

Alle Datenquellen

Originalquellen dieser Schätzungen

GDP pc: 2008 - 2022: Total Economy Database the Conference Board for all countries included in TED. Otherwise UN national accounts statistics

Südkorea

  • 1911-1990: Cha, M.S., Kim, N.N., Park, K.-J., Park, Y. (Eds.) (2020), Historical Statistics of Korea. Studies in Economic History, New York: Springer Publishing
  • 1820, 1870: Maddison, A. Monitoring the World Economy, 1995

Jordanien

  • 1: Scheidel, W. and Friesen, S. J., ‘The size of the economy and the distribution of income in the Roman Empire’, Journal of Roman Studies, 99 (2009), pp. 61–91
  • 1820, 1870, 1913, 1950: Pamuk, S. (2006), Estimating Economic Growth in the Middle East since 1820, The Journal of Economic History, vol 66, no. 3, pp. 809 - 828

Saudi-Arabien

  • 1820, 1870, 1913, 1950: Pamuk, S. (2006), Estimating Economic Growth in the Middle East since 1820, The Journal of Economic History, vol 66, no. 3, pp. 809 - 828