Zum Inhalt springen
ChartBasis
Sprache auswählen: Deutsch

Bevölkerung, Langzeitreihe: Länder vergleichen

Bevölkerung, Langzeitreihe für bis zu vier Länder nebeneinander.

Verglichene Länder

Land hinzufügen

Bevölkerung, Langzeitreihe nach Land

Bevölkerung, Langzeitreihe

Jährlich, Tausend Personen

Quelle: Maddison Project Database 2023
Bevölkerung, Langzeitreihe: neueste Beobachtungen je Land
Datum PortugalKuba
10.14411.108
10.21511.147
10.28811.179
10.34411.210
10.38311.241
10.40811.260
10.42711.268
10.44611.266
10.46711.261
10.48211.258
10.49211.260
10.49711.262
10.48111.264
10.43911.262
10.38211.250
10.32611.238
10.28311.214
10.25111.180
10.22611.147
10.20911.116
10.21211.105
10.22311.089
10.21411.046
10.20011.003

Source: Bolt, J. and van Zanden, J.L. (2024), Maddison style estimates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2023 update, Journal of Economic Surveys, 1-41, DOI 10.1111/joes.12618. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. The original sources are listed on each page.

Alle Datenquellen

Originalquellen dieser Schätzungen

GDP pc: 2008 - 2022: Total Economy Database the Conference Board for all countries included in TED. Otherwise UN national accounts statistics

Portugal

  • 1: Scheidel, W. and Friesen, S. J., ‘The size of the economy and the distribution of income in the Roman Empire’, Journal of Roman Studies, 99 (2009), pp. 61–91
  • 1530–1850: Palma, N., & Reis, J. (2019). From Convergence to Divergence: Portuguese Economic Growth, 1527–1850. The Journal of Economic History, 79(2), 477-506. doi:10.1017/S0022050719000056
  • 1850-1913: Pedro Lains, "How Far Can We Go? Measuring Portuguese Economic Growth (1850-1913)"
  • 1938-1950: R. Janes Cartado and N.E. Sequeira da Rosa, Series Longas as Contas Nacionais Portuguesas 1958-1985, Banco de Portugal, Lisbon,

Kuba

  • 1690–1895: Santamaria Garcia, A. (2005). Las Cuentas nacionales de Cuba, 1960 - 2005', mimeo
  • 1902–1958: Ward, M. and Devereux, J. (2012), “The Road Not Taken: Pre-Revolutionary Cuban Living Standards in Comparative Perspective” Journal of Economic History, 72(1): 104–132