Ir al contenido
ChartBasis
Elegir idioma: Español

Población, historia de largo plazo: comparar países

Consulta Población, historia de largo plazo de hasta cuatro países, lado a lado.

Países comparados

Añadir un país

Población, historia de largo plazo por país

Población, historia de largo plazo

Anual, Miles de personas

Fuente: Maddison Project Database 2023
Población, historia de largo plazo: últimas observaciones por país
Fecha Corea del SurEgipto
46.61766.001
47.00867.377
47.37068.790
47.64570.269
47.89271.785
48.08373.298
48.18574.832
48.43876.432
48.68478.140
49.05579.945
49.30881.840
49.55483.844
49.93785.969
50.20088.198
50.42990.566
50.74793.009
51.01595.432
51.21897.882
51.362100.303
51.585102.617
51.765104.816
51.836106.893
51.745108.871
51.731110.593

Source: Bolt, J. and van Zanden, J.L. (2024), Maddison style estimates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2023 update, Journal of Economic Surveys, 1-41, DOI 10.1111/joes.12618. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. The original sources are listed on each page.

Todas las fuentes de datos

Fuentes originales de estas estimaciones

GDP pc: 2008 - 2022: Total Economy Database the Conference Board for all countries included in TED. Otherwise UN national accounts statistics

Corea del Sur

  • 1911-1990: Cha, M.S., Kim, N.N., Park, K.-J., Park, Y. (Eds.) (2020), Historical Statistics of Korea. Studies in Economic History, New York: Springer Publishing
  • 1820, 1870: Maddison, A. Monitoring the World Economy, 1995

Egipto

  • 1: Scheidel, W. and Friesen, S. J., ‘The size of the economy and the distribution of income in the Roman Empire’, Journal of Roman Studies, 99 (2009), pp. 61–91
  • 700 – 1500: Pamuk, Ş. and M. Shatzmiller (2011). “Real Wages and GDP per capita in the Medieval Islamic Middle East in Comparative Perspective, 700-1500”, paper presented at the 9th Conference of the European Historical Economics Society, Dublin, September 2-3, 2011.
  • 1820, 1870, 1913, 1950: Pamuk, S. (2006), Estimating Economic Growth in the Middle East since 1820, The Journal of Economic History, vol 66, no. 3, pp. 809 - 828