Aller au contenu
ChartBasis
Choisir une langue: Français

Population, série longue : comparer les pays

Consultez Population, série longue pour jusqu’à quatre pays, côte à côte.

Pays comparés

Quatre pays sont comparés, le maximum que le graphique peut montrer clairement. Retirez-en un pour en ajouter un autre.

Population, série longue par pays

Population, série longue

Annuelle, Milliers de personnes

Source : Maddison Project Database 2023
Population, série longue : dernières observations par pays
Date BarbadeChineRoumanieÉtats-Unis
2731 248 89922 414279 040
2741 258 40122 262282 162
2751 267 17822 106284 969
2761 275 37921 931287 625
2781 283 06421 828290 108
2791 290 62021 704292 805
2801 298 24521 571295 517
2811 305 11621 443298 380
2821 311 87721 129301 231
2831 318 55920 779304 094
2851 324 99320 607306 772
2861 331 35720 485309 327
2871 339 54920 385311 583
2881 349 53720 296313 878
2891 357 52020 224316 060
2901 366 65420 151318 386
2911 373 40620 055320 739
2911 382 40119 938323 072
2921 390 13619 823325 122
2931 395 39819 713326 838
2941 400 03519 622328 330
2941 402 06019 496331 512
2951 402 53719 351332 032
2951 401 69319 266333 288

Source: Bolt, J. and van Zanden, J.L. (2024), Maddison style estimates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2023 update, Journal of Economic Surveys, 1-41, DOI 10.1111/joes.12618. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. The original sources are listed on each page.

Toutes les sources de données

Sources originales de ces estimations

GDP pc: 2008 - 2022: Total Economy Database the Conference Board for all countries included in TED. Otherwise UN national accounts statistics

Chine

  • 1000-1661: Broadberry, S.N., Guan, Hanhui and David Daokui Li (2018), “China, Europe and the Great Divergence: a Study in Historical National Accounting, 980-1850”, Journal of Economic History, 78, 4, 955-1000
  • 1661–1933: Broadberry, S.N., Guan, Hanhui and David Daokui Li (2018), “China, Europe and the Great Divergence: a Study in Historical National Accounting, 980-1850”, Journal of Economic History, 78, 4, 955-1000
  • 1661–1933: Xu, Y. Z. Shi, B. van Leeuwen, Y Ni, Z Zhang, and Y Ma, (2016) 'Chinese National Income, ca. 1661-1933', Australian Economic History Review 57(3), 368–393
  • 1952–2008: Wu, Harry X. (2014), “China’s growth and productivity performance debate revisited – Accounting for China’s sources of growth with a new data set” The Conference Board Economics Program Working Paper Series EWP#14-01.

Roumanie

  • 1862–1995: Axenciuc, V. (2012). Produsul intern brut al Romaniei, Vol. 1, Institutl de Economie Nationala, Bucarest
  • 1915-1919 & 1949: Voinea, L., Cojocaru, A., Costache, B., Grigoraș, V., Lovin, H., Neagu, C., Orțan, D., & Tănase, A. (2019). One Hundred Years of Honesty: Recovering the Lost Memory of the Romanian Economy 1918-2018.

États-Unis

  • 1650 - 1790: McCusker, John J., ‘Colonial Statistics’, Historical Statistics of the United States: Earliest Time to the Present, in S. B. Carter, S. S. Gartner, M. R. Haineset al. New York, Cambridge University Press. V-671.
  • 1790 - 1870: Sutch, R. (2006). National Income and Product. Historical Statistics of the United States: Earliest Time to the Present, in S. B. Carter, S. S. Gartner, M. R. Haineset al. New York, Cambridge University Press III-23-25.
  • 1800-1830: Prados de la Escosura, L. (2009). “Lost Decades? Economic Performance in Post-Independence Latin America,” Journal of Latin America Studies 41: 279–307. (updated data)
  • 1820-1950: GDP movement from Maddison (1995a), amended for 1820–70 to include income of the indigenous population (taken to be $400 per capita in 1820 and 1870).

Aucune liste séparée n’est publiée pour Barbade ; la base de données dans son ensemble est citée ci-dessus.