Aller au contenu
ChartBasis
Choisir une langue: Français

Population, série longue : comparer les pays

Consultez Population, série longue pour jusqu’à quatre pays, côte à côte.

Pays comparés

Ajouter un pays

Population, série longue par pays

Population, série longue

Annuelle, Milliers de personnes

Source : Maddison Project Database 2023
Population, série longue : dernières observations par pays
Date ÉquateurMacédoine du NordJordanie
12 2682 0064 591
12 4462 0174 700
12 6292 0264 811
12 8272 0114 923
13 0742 0185 037
13 3682 0245 161
13 6612 0285 295
13 9152 0315 765
14 1332 0356 243
14 3522 0386 397
14 5692 0426 538
14 7862 0466 680
15 0022 0496 840
15 2182 0526 952
15 4332 0557 706
15 6472 0588 839
15 8602 0619 506
16 0722 0639 863
16 2822 06510 066
16 4892 06710 273
16 6932 06810 480
16 8942 06510 628
17 0932 05710 716
17 2882 04810 849

Source: Bolt, J. and van Zanden, J.L. (2024), Maddison style estimates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2023 update, Journal of Economic Surveys, 1-41, DOI 10.1111/joes.12618. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. The original sources are listed on each page.

Toutes les sources de données

Sources originales de ces estimations

GDP pc: 2008 - 2022: Total Economy Database the Conference Board for all countries included in TED. Otherwise UN national accounts statistics

Équateur

  • 1833-1938: Prados de la Escosura, L. (2009). “Lost Decades? Economic Performance in Post-Independence Latin America,” Journal of Latin America Studies 41: 279–307. (updated data). We use the growth rate between 1933 and 1938 from Prados de la Escosura (2009) and link that to the 1939 level of Maddison’s original estimates.

Macédoine du Nord

  • 1952-2008: Milanovic (2011). Estimates provided to the Maddison-Project

Jordanie

  • 1: Scheidel, W. and Friesen, S. J., ‘The size of the economy and the distribution of income in the Roman Empire’, Journal of Roman Studies, 99 (2009), pp. 61–91
  • 1820, 1870, 1913, 1950: Pamuk, S. (2006), Estimating Economic Growth in the Middle East since 1820, The Journal of Economic History, vol 66, no. 3, pp. 809 - 828