Aller au contenu
ChartBasis
Choisir une langue: Français

Population, série longue : comparer les pays

Consultez Population, série longue pour jusqu’à quatre pays, côte à côte.

Pays comparés

Ajouter un pays

Population, série longue par pays

Population, série longue

Annuelle, Milliers de personnes

Source : Maddison Project Database 2023
Population, série longue : dernières observations par pays
Date ItalieVenezuela
56 94023 188
56 96623 601
57 00424 011
57 11424 425
57 42324 841
57 85225 255
58 19125 667
58 42426 079
58 78126 589
59 23627 098
59 58027 510
59 84427 920
60 05228 327
60 21628 722
60 33729 111
60 34629 418
60 25529 693
60 14029 961
60 02729 856
59 90228 858
59 75427 921
59 46427 871
59 15828 316
58 96628 418

Source: Bolt, J. and van Zanden, J.L. (2024), Maddison style estimates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2023 update, Journal of Economic Surveys, 1-41, DOI 10.1111/joes.12618. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. The original sources are listed on each page.

Toutes les sources de données

Sources originales de ces estimations

GDP pc: 2008 - 2022: Total Economy Database the Conference Board for all countries included in TED. Otherwise UN national accounts statistics

Italie

  • 1451-1861: Chilosi, D., & Ciccarelli, C. (2023). Italy in the Great Divergence: What Can We Learn from Engel’s Law (SSRN Scholarly Paper 4514091).
  • 1861-1871 (North Italy): Malanima, P. (2010), “The long decline of a leading economy: GDP in central and northern Italy, 1300–1913” European Review of Economic History 15 (2): 169–219.
  • 1871-1990: Baffigi, A. (2011).”Italian National Accounts, 1861-2011”, Banca d’Italia Economic History Working Papers 18.

Venezuela

  • 1830–2012: De Corso, G. (2013). El crecimiento economico de Venuzuela, Desde la Oligarquia Conservadora Hasta La Revolucion Bolivariana: 1830-2012. Uno Vision cuantitativa *: Venezuelan Economic Growth From The Conservative Oligarchy To The Bolivarian Revolution (1830-2012), Revista De Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History, 31(3), 321-357. doi:10.1017/S0212610913000190