Aller au contenu
ChartBasis
Choisir une langue: Français

Population, série longue : comparer les pays

Consultez Population, série longue pour jusqu’à quatre pays, côte à côte.

Pays comparés

Ajouter un pays

Population, série longue par pays

Population, série longue

Annuelle, Milliers de personnes

Source : Maddison Project Database 2023
Population, série longue : dernières observations par pays
Date Macédoine du NordÉquateurJordanie
2 00612 2684 591
2 01712 4464 700
2 02612 6294 811
2 01112 8274 923
2 01813 0745 037
2 02413 3685 161
2 02813 6615 295
2 03113 9155 765
2 03514 1336 243
2 03814 3526 397
2 04214 5696 538
2 04614 7866 680
2 04915 0026 840
2 05215 2186 952
2 05515 4337 706
2 05815 6478 839
2 06115 8609 506
2 06316 0729 863
2 06516 28210 066
2 06716 48910 273
2 06816 69310 480
2 06516 89410 628
2 05717 09310 716
2 04817 28810 849

Source: Bolt, J. and van Zanden, J.L. (2024), Maddison style estimates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2023 update, Journal of Economic Surveys, 1-41, DOI 10.1111/joes.12618. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. The original sources are listed on each page.

Toutes les sources de données

Sources originales de ces estimations

GDP pc: 2008 - 2022: Total Economy Database the Conference Board for all countries included in TED. Otherwise UN national accounts statistics

Macédoine du Nord

  • 1952-2008: Milanovic (2011). Estimates provided to the Maddison-Project

Équateur

  • 1833-1938: Prados de la Escosura, L. (2009). “Lost Decades? Economic Performance in Post-Independence Latin America,” Journal of Latin America Studies 41: 279–307. (updated data). We use the growth rate between 1933 and 1938 from Prados de la Escosura (2009) and link that to the 1939 level of Maddison’s original estimates.

Jordanie

  • 1: Scheidel, W. and Friesen, S. J., ‘The size of the economy and the distribution of income in the Roman Empire’, Journal of Roman Studies, 99 (2009), pp. 61–91
  • 1820, 1870, 1913, 1950: Pamuk, S. (2006), Estimating Economic Growth in the Middle East since 1820, The Journal of Economic History, vol 66, no. 3, pp. 809 - 828